The Archaeological Site of Carthage is a site dispersed in the current city of Carthage (Tunisia) and classified as part of the World Heritage by UNESCO since 1979.
UNESCO World Heritage Site | |
---|---|
![]() "The Lady of Carthage" (mosaic from the 6th century). | |
Location | Tunisia |
Criteria | (ii) (iii) (vi) |
Reference | 37 |
Inscription | 1979 (3rd Session) |
Extensions | 498.08 ha |
Coordinates | 36°55′N 10°17′E / 36.91°N 10.28°E |
It is dominated by the hill of Byrsa, which was the center of the Punic city. Today, it is distinguished by the massive silhouette of the Acropolium, built at the end of the 19th century on the presumed site of the tomb of King Louis IX (Saint Louis), who died there during the Eighth Crusade. Near the cathedral, opposite this empty tomb whose remains were repatriated to France, are the remains of the most important quarter of the city. Only a few foundations and some fragments of columns remain, but one can gauge the power that emanated from the city at that time: immense dimensions, large spaces, panoramic views, and the organization of the streets.
The rapid development of the modern city, risking the destruction of the remains forever, led prominent Tunisian archaeologists to alert public opinion, and UNESCO launched a vast international campaign between 1972 and 1992 to save Carthage. This turning point was completed with its classification as a World Heritage Site.
This article will only address the current state of the archaeological site, a large number of elements having been lost in ancient or more recent times. The difficulty for visitors now lies in the extreme dispersion of the remains, even though some clusters can be distinguished. For the city and the country, the challenge is more complex: to protect the testimonies of the past while minimizing disruption to the daily life of the population.
Geography
editLocation
edit"History attaches itself to the places it has once chosen," according to Serge Lancel.[1] It must be acknowledged that geography played a significant role in Carthage's role, with the great city being compared to a "ship at anchor" by Strabo.[2] The location of cities among the Phoenicians responded to the dual requirement of openness to the sea and protection from the interior lands. The foundations of Tyre, Sidon, and Gades followed this pattern[3]
More than the older colony of Utica, Carthage appears favored by geography. It is located at the border of the two basins of the Mediterranean Sea, thus in a very conducive location for trade. At the bottom of the Gulf of Tunis, facing Jebel Boukornine, ancient Carthage presents itself as a promontory barred by hills, the main one being Byrsa, a territory easy to defend and bordered by the sea on three of its sides. Polybius speaks of it as a "peninsula almost entirely surrounded either by the sea ("the Sebkha Ariana was not yet closed and formed a bay"), or by a lake and connected to the continent by an isthmus barred and by a chain of difficult-to-cross hills"[4]
Protected on the sea side, the city also appears preserved by the hills and by the Lake of Tunis, with the presence of two sebkhas reinforcing this particularity.
Soil characteristics
editAlthough the site does not have many complete buildings, the ground is littered with fragments of the most precious marbles.[5] Among these fragments are two or three varieties of white statuary marble — probably from the quarries of Paros and Luni — and a variety of Pentelic marble, several varieties of cipollino marble, many fragments of yellow Siena marble, Pavonazzo marble, porphyry feldspar in large quantities — sometimes in blocks of several cubic feet — and pink Egyptian porphyry.[6]
Pacho thinks that, like in Cyrene, the territory of Carthage does not offer precious materials but rather materials, such as marble, porphyry, and granite, foreign to the city and imported from afar.[5] De Buch, a learned geologist from Berlin, and Mesnard de La Groye, a former geology teacher at the Collège de France, having studied these fragments, believe they come from quarries in Italy and Greece.[5]
Notes on Cyrenaica by Frederick William Beechey report around Carthage the presence of a conglomerate of sandstone and a limestone without fossils and therefore not very solid.[7]
History and rediscovery of the site
editThe great African city experienced rapid expansion as a civilization of the Mediterranean melting pot specific to Phoenician culture,[8] then this growth was brutally halted, but the city managed to be reborn through the will of the Roman victors and thanks to its exceptional location. Nevertheless, in the turmoil of the divisions of the Mediterranean world, Carthage passed into the background: first pillaged, then forgotten, leading Gustave Flaubert to write in a letter to Ernest Feydeau in October 1858 that "we know nothing about Carthage."[9]
It took the tenacity of a few enthusiasts to change this state of affairs, and a risk of final destruction for an international campaign to prevent the rival of Rome from falling definitively into oblivion, into "the abyss of history."[10]
Ancient history of the site
editRegarding the first occupants, the Libyco-Numidian population substrate, little information is available. Archaeology is silent on this matter, the only mentions available being the ancient texts of Appian (Libyca, 1, 2) and Justin (Epitome of the Philippic Histories, XVIII, 5, 8).
For over a millennium, the city of Carthage was at the forefront of history as a crossroads of civilizations due to its geographical location.
Phoenician and Punic Carthage
editAccording to tradition, the city was founded by Dido (also known as Elissa) in 814 BC, about sixty years before its rival, Rome, which would eventually surpass it. The city quickly expanded, creating various colonies and confronting Greek colonies, particularly in Sicily. These, especially Syracuse and Agrigento, brought war to Punic lands at the beginning of the 5th century and then at the end of the 4th century. It was during the vicissitudes of this antagonism that the destruction of the Punic city of Kerkouane is placed.
The first relations with Rome were peaceful, as evidenced by treaties concluded in 509 BC,[11] then in 348 BC and 306 BC, which guaranteed Carthage exclusivity in trade from Africa and no pillaging against Rome's allies in Italy. The episodes known as the Punic Wars saw the antagonism extend over more than a century, from 264 BC to 146 BC. A favorable outcome for the Punic city seemed possible, as evidenced by the adventure of General Hannibal Barca. The first conflict took place from 264 BC to 241 BC, resulting in Carthage losing Sicily and paying a heavy tribute.
This first defeat led to serious social consequences with the episode of the Mercenary War, from 240 BC to 237 BC, with the city being saved by Hamilcar Barca. Carthage then oriented its imperialism towards the Iberian Peninsula and clashed with Rome's allies, making the second conflict inevitable (219 BC-201 BC). After 205 BC, the war took place only on African soil, with the year 202 BC marking the final victory of Scipio Africanus at Zama. The following fifty years saw Carthage regularly repay the heavy tribute but also equip itself with costly facilities like the Punic ports in their final state of development. Yet, faced with the city's recovery and the end of tribute payments, Rome demanded that the Carthaginians abandon the city and withdraw to the hinterland.[12] On this subject, Velleius Paterculus wrote that "Rome, already mistress of the world, did not feel safe as long as the name of Carthage existed."[13] The logical refusal that followed this intransigence led to the third conflict, which, along with the siege of Carthage, lasted three years.
At its end, even if salt was not spread on the ground as legend has it, the destruction of the city was total, and a curse was placed on its site. Remarkably, this city with its ground declared sacer, meaning cursed, was able to be reborn and become a crucial center for the diffusion of cultural, artistic, and spiritual novelties, even if it was not their original cradle.
Roman Carthage
editGaius Gracchus, tribune of the plebs in 123 BC, attempted in 122 BC to establish a colony of former veterans, a short-lived attempt — the memory of the old rival was still vivid less than a quarter of a century after its destruction — but archaeological traces remain in the Carthaginian countryside, particularly the centuriations. The desire to settle veterans resurfaced with Julius Caesar, but this project also came to nothing due to Caesar's assassination on the Ides of March in 44 BC. The rebirth of the city was the work of Augustus, who refounded it in 29 BC and renamed it Colonia Iulia Concordia Carthago: to the ancient name were added his own family — the Julii — and the concord so desired after the horrors of the civil wars that had agitated Rome in the last century BC.
The first constructions of the city were public; they responded to the design of making it an example of Romanity and launching the process of Romanization in this region with a Libyco-Numidian and Punic past.[14] Private installations came only later, with the growing enrichment provided by the numerous exports to Rome: mainly wheat, but also olive oil intended particularly for the cura annonae system. From an administrative city — seat of the procurator — it became an important and prosperous city with a population estimated at 300,000 inhabitants at the time of the Vandal conquest.[15] However, the first Roman city is poorly known due to the successive catastrophes that struck it: earthquakes, fire under the reign of Antoninus Pius.
The accession to imperial power of the Severan dynasty reflects the enrichment of the African land at the end of the 2nd century and the beginning of the 3rd century. However, the crises that shook the Roman Empire in the 3rd century had serious consequences for Carthage, notably during the usurpation of Gordian I and the repression that followed his fall in 238: the city was pillaged, including its temples.[16] Similarly, from 308 to 311, the city became the capital of the usurper Domitius Alexander and, upon his fall, was again subjected to pillaging. With this century, Carthage nevertheless experienced renewed economic growth, expressed by the vitality of both private constructions, with multiple villas demonstrating the opulence of their owners, and public constructions, particularly the facilities for the new dominant cult.
Christian Carthage
editIn an open space like Carthage was at the time — the port was notably connected to the great cities of Alexandria and Antioch, which were two major centers of evangelization[17] — Christianity developed early, following the important Jewish communities established in the city.[18] By the end of the 1st century, colonists, merchants, and soldiers were also agents of the propagation of Christianity,[17] and the new religion progressed rapidly in the province, despite sporadic persecutions, with the first martyrs attested as early as July 17, 180.[17]
The city thus became one of the essential centers for the diffusion of the new faith, and religious confrontations with pagans were violent. Carthage and the province of Africa were quickly considered the beacon of Western Latin Christianity;[17] Tertullian was one of the first Christian authors in Latin. Saint Cyprian, its first bishop, was martyred on September 14, 258,[17] at a time when the new religion was already widespread in society. This expansion was not without clashes, particularly during the Donatist schism — a consequence of rivalries among prelates eager to occupy the seat of the primate of Africa — which was definitively condemned at the Conference of Carthage opened on June 1, 411,[17] organized by the party of its most ardent contradictor, Bishop Augustine of Hippo.
Augustine accused the schismatics of having severed the ties between the African Catholic Church and the original Eastern Churches.[17] Despite this religious struggle, the economic, social, and cultural context was relatively favorable at the time of Christianity's triumph.[19] It was accompanied by a religious organization of the city in the 4th century: a division into six districts was made, and basilicas marked each of them. The second city of the West after Rome, Carthage had at the beginning of the 5th century a population of over 300,000 inhabitants, and its area exceeded 321 hectares.[15]
The city was conquered by the Vandal troops of Genseric in 439. In addition to the destructions carried out by the newcomers, attested among others by an author like Victor of Vita, they attempted to impose Arianism in place of Catholicism: persecution was then legitimized, and the approximately 500 clergy of Carthage were expelled.[17] This Vandal period coincided with a new era of persecutions.[20] Then the Vandal Kingdom eventually collapsed, and the Byzantine emperor Justinian I became the new master in 533. The Byzantine period experienced various vicissitudes, including the subjugation of the members of the Church of Africa, while the page turned on ancient history with the Arabo-Muslim conquest of 698, which saw Carthage pass into the background of history.
Decline and rediscovery
editDecline in historiography
editBefore its capture in 698, the capital of the province of Africa had emptied of its Byzantine inhabitants. The decline was evident shortly after Justinian's reconquest, with Abdelmajid Ennabli mentioning a city "neglected by the central power preoccupied with its own survival, gradually abandoned by a population whose aristocracy emigrated."[21] By the early 7th century, archaeology testifies, according to Liliane Ennabli, to a "shrunken city, retracted on its center."[22] The conqueror Hassan ibn al-Nu'man had the port facilities destroyed to prevent any return of the Byzantines, dealing a final blow to the city.[23] The materials were massively reused: "for centuries, [it] was nothing more than a marble quarry," as M'hamed Hassine Fantar wrote.[24] This recovery was for the benefit of buildings in present-day Tunisia — the forest of columns in the Zitouna Mosque comes from there — but also of important buildings in the Mediterranean basin, such as the Cathedral of Pisa. The recovery of the "spoils of the great corpse lying on the shores of the gulf"[25] was not only of the noblest materials, columns, and capitals: a large number of lime kilns were found on the site, particularly during the clearance of the Baths of Antoninus, contradicting Al-Bakri, who claimed that "the marble is so important in Carthage that if all the inhabitants of Ifriqiya gathered to extract the blocks and transport them elsewhere, they could not accomplish their task."[26] Al Idrissi, an eyewitness to this frenzied predation, declared: "These excavations do not cease, the marbles are transported far away to all countries, and no one leaves Carthage without loading considerable quantities on ships or otherwise."[27]
Scientific research
editThe early 19th century was that of pioneers, both travelers and visionaries. Christian Tuxen Falbe, consul of Denmark, drew the first topography of the remains in his Recherches sur l'emplacement de Carthage published in 1833. A historical and archaeological society was born in Paris and aroused interest, even a "fashion of irresistible attraction"[28] that found a certain culmination with the publication of Salammbô by Gustave Flaubert in 1858. Charles Ernest Beulé, for his part, highlighted during a trip the Roman apses on the hill of Byrsa but quickly faced the difficulties of excavations on this space, which had been reworked many times, not without predicting that "Carthage will have its turn, like Egypt, like Nineveh, and like Babylon."[29] The role played by the White Fathers also deserves to be recalled. Thus, Father Delattre was sent there from 1875 by Cardinal Lavigerie with not only an apostolic but also an archaeological purpose.[30] He was particularly interested in Punic necropolises as well as Christian basilicas.[31] During the first years of the French protectorate, the Bey of Tunis signed several decrees, one concerning the creation of the National Museum of Bardo, and the other regulating excavations and protecting the heritage.[32]
Carthage then saw a handful of enthusiasts, often amateur archaeologists, working tirelessly to bring the site out of oblivion. Even if some excavation methods may seem questionable today, it must be noted, as Serge Lancel did, that they "multiplied remarks and observations still usable at a time when official archaeology was confined to necropolises or disinterested in Carthage."[33] Thanks to these enthusiasts, working at a time when heritage protection was still vague, essential elements were safeguarded, sometimes at the cost of their own money.
Such is the case of the discovery of the tophet in 1921 by Paul Gielly and François Icard under rocambolesque circumstances. We must also mention Dr. Louis Carton, who uncovered the "fountain of a thousand amphorae,"[34] even if the excavations were not always devoid of personal interests, as the recovery of objects was common at the time. As for Charles Saumagne , thanks to his observations of the terrain, he drew the plan of the Roman city as early as 1924, a plan that remains largely valid even after the latest excavation campaigns.[35] The last of these pioneers is Pierre Cintas , a customs administration official who undertook university studies to devote himself to the subject and authored a Manuel d'archéologie punique (1970-1976). This work, left unfinished at the time of his death, remains a primary synthesis tool on the first excavations.
From May 1972, the teams of the UNESCO international mission[36] worked under the coordination of the site curator Abdelmajid Ennabli.[37]
Nationality | Activities | Personalities |
---|---|---|
Germany | Punic then Roman residential quarter (near the shore)
discovery of a Punic temple called of Apollo |
Friedrich Rakob |
Bulgaria | rotunda of Damous El Karita | Stefan Boyadjiev |
Canada | circular monument, Theodosian wall, and suburban villas | Pierre Senay, Colin M. Wells, Vanda Vitali, Jeremy Rossiter |
Denmark | Punic residential quarter at the foot of the Amilcar cliff | Soren Dietz |
United States | Tophet of Salammbô, commercial port, and circus | Lawrence E. Stager, John H. Humphrey, Naomi Norman |
France | hill of Byrsa
villa of the cryptoporticus |
Serge Lancel, Jean-Paul Thuillier, Jean-Paul Morel, Pierre Gros, Jean Deneauve
Jean-Pierre Darmon |
Italy | cadastration | Andrea Carandini, Giuseppe Pucci |
United Kingdom | military port and enhancement of the Admiralty islet | Henry Hurst |
Sweden | Roman villa | Carl-Gustaf Styrenius |
Tunisia | anastylosis of the frigidarium column and restoration of the Baths of Antoninus
enhancement of the villa of the aviary |
Liliane Ennabli, Fethi Chelbi |
Private spaces
editEven though many Roman villas have been excavated for a long time, few remains have been highlighted on the site, except in the park called "Roman villas." The decorative elements, mainly mosaics, removed, the wall sections were often abandoned, and the site was left to pillaging. For this reason, and somewhat paradoxically, it is easier to stroll through a late Punic residential quarter, protected by the Roman embankment of the hill of Byrsa for two millennia. Another earlier Punic quarter, called "Magon quarter," was excavated by the sea.
- Ruins of residential quarters
-
Punic house of Byrsa.
-
Villa of the aviary.
-
Mosaic of the aviary.
-
Mosaic of the horses.
-
Upper elements of the Punic wall surrounding the Magon quarter.
-
Punic lapidary elements (column fragments).
-
Quarter of the Roman villas with the villa at the cryptoporticus on the right.
-
Overview of part of the quarter called Roman villas.
Byrsa
editOn the summit of the hill of Byrsa, the location of the Roman forum, a Punic residential quarter from the last century of the city's existence was uncovered, dated more precisely to the early 2nd century BC.[38] It was excavated by the French archaeologist Serge Lancel. Visiting this site is interesting for those who cannot go to Kerkouane (a Punic city on Cape Bon). Indeed, the organization of the quarter and the dwellings between shops and private spaces is particularly significant.[39]
The habitat is typical and even stereotyped, with a room on the street that could be used as a shop, a cistern installed in the basement to collect water for domestic use, and a long corridor on the right side leading to a courtyard with a cesspool, around which small rooms are arranged in varying numbers. Some floors are covered with mosaics called pavimenta punica, sometimes in the middle of a characteristic red mortar.
The remains were preserved thanks to the Roman embankments, the substructure of the forum whose foundation piles dot the quarter. The different housing blocks are separated by orthogonal streets, approximately six meters wide, with beaten earth roadways.[40] One can also see in situ stairs intended to compensate for the slope of the hill. This building program, which required organization and political will, inspired the name of the quarter, baptized "Hannibal quarter" in reference to the suffetate of the great general at the beginning of the 2nd century BC.
Magon
editNot far from the sea, an area of the Punic city was excavated by German archaeologists. They discovered a section of the rampart that protected the city in the 5th century BC as well as an entire residential quarter whose evolution during the two centuries preceding the destruction of 146 BC they were able to decipher.[41] Even if the site is open to tourists, it remains difficult to interpret for non-specialists. Nevertheless, the fragments of Punic columns and several upper elements of the seafront wall are moving, albeit tenuous, testimonies. One can see a villa with a peristyle.
Archaeologists have determined an urban organization scheme from the oldest developments of which traces have been preserved, with streets about three meters wide and a notable exception: a vast street nine meters wide heading towards a "sea gate" opened in the rampart.[40]
In a small antiquarium, restitutions of the site at various periods of the Punic city are exhibited, as well as a maquette of a stone extraction well located in El Haouaria.
Roman villas and Kobba Bent el Rey
editNear the theater, an area constituting today the park called "Roman villas" was uncovered. It houses, in addition to the famous "villa of the aviary," named after the main mosaic that decorates it, many significant remains related to the topography of the place. The slope is quite steep there, and interesting elements of several villas have been cleared, including a cryptoporticus that housed some of the objects now visible in the epigraphic collections of the National Museum of Bardo.[42]
The "mosaic of the aviary" is located in the villa of the same name, around a colonnaded courtyard, and depicts birds among foliage.[43] This building, dated to the 4th century, has undergone careful restoration. Both by its plan, which gives pride of place to reception rooms, and by its decor, particularly mosaics, the wealth of the owner is evident in what remains one of the most telling examples on the site of Carthage.
The "mosaic of the horses," replaced not far from this villa, is a mixture of mosaics and panels of marble from various origins where squares of marble in opus sectile alternate with mosaics of horses whose names are suggested by a kind of rebus.
Towards the back of the park are the remains of the Basilica of Damous El Karita as well as those of a circular monument whose purpose remains mysterious. On the hill of Bordj Djedid, within the precincts of the Carthage high school, persists a beautiful vaulted underground construction currently called Kobba Bent el Rey; it is dated to the years 320-340.[44] This building, despite uncertainty about its original purpose, is considered the best-preserved residential element on the site of Carthage.
Necropolises
editThe necropolises of the ancient city are quite difficult to recognize on the current site, with the only relatively significant remains discovered and still visible being a number of Punic tombs, particularly in the park of the Antonine Baths and on the southern flank of the hill of Byrsa. The rediscovery of the city and the Punic civilization has long been dependent on the excavation of necropolises alone.[45]
- Overview of tombs from various necropolises
-
Punic tomb in the Antonine Baths park.
-
Punic tomb on the southern flank of Byrsa.
-
Punic tombs in the Antonine Baths park.
Funeral rites, inhumation, and incineration in Carthage
editThe rite of inhumation dominates in Carthage in the early period, in relation to "a significant mixture of the population with the indigenous Libyans," according to Serge Lancel, even though incineration exists in some necropolises of the Punic city.[46] Cremation is a sign of fidelity to an ancient tradition from Phoenicia[47] and takes place elsewhere than at the burial site.[48] No ustrinum is known.[49] Incinerated deceased are placed in amphorae, and those inhumed in pits or wells are either in coffins or directly in the ground.[50] Inhumed deceased are laid on their backs, following "the Eastern tradition."[51] The Libyan populations, on the other hand, place their deceased in a "lateral decubitus flexed" position.[52]
Incineration dominates in Carthage from the 5th century BC, either for a spiritual reason or due to lack of space, according to Serge Lancel, with the old necropolises being disused to make way for urban growth;[53] however, "inhumation in large funeral chambers persists." The furnishings in the tombs also evolve, between tombs with provisions and others with little to accompany the deceased, in relation to two beliefs about the afterlife, according to Hélène Bénichou-Safar.[54] The remains of incinerated persons are deposited in ossuaries.[55] The coexistence of rites noted in Carthage is also observed at the archaeological site of Motya.[55] During their funerals, the deceased are wrapped in a shroud and placed on a bench or in a coffin[55] or troughs.[56] They may also be buried in ceremonial clothing, with fibulae.[57]
The bodies were perhaps washed beforehand, with a resinous preparation poured over the body and deposited as a "conservative practice."[58] This practice, observed in the necropolis of the Rabs, is dated to the end of the 4th - beginning of the 3rd century BC.[59]
The bodies are placed in the tomb using ropes passing through the funeral shaft. A funeral ceremony may have taken place with rituals related to Demeter, the goddess of fertility and immortality, to the Dionysian cult, or other cults for the dead. Incense or perfumes may have been burned,[60] and a small animal may have been sacrificed.[61] Hélène Bénichou-Safar notes that nothing can prove the existence of funeral banquets or processions of mourners, even though for the latter tradition, late testimonies exist.[62] A cult may have been rendered to the dead,[63] and the necropolises were then perceived as a "sacred area (...) inviolable, like divine sanctuaries."[64]
The interiors of the burials have accessories, niches, and benches of very varied shapes.[65] Some tombs contain up to eight deceased and are "a family vault." After the ceremony, the pits could be filled with white sand or red sand from present-day Sidi Bou Saïd, or have a system of sealing slabs.[66] 10 to 15% of the inhumed deceased were buried in a stone sarcophagus, either directly or in a wooden structure like a coffin.[67]
Necropolises of Carthage and their organization
editThe necropolises of Carthage could cover about 60 hectares, and Salah-Eddine Tlatli gives the Punic city an area greater than 300 hectares.[68] Hélène Bénichou-Safar , in her book published in 1982 and taking into account works up to 1977,[69] lists more than 3,000 tombs excavated over a century on the archaeological site of Carthage.[70] M'hamed Hassine Fantar thinks this number can go up to 3,500.[71] The excavators of the necropolis of the Rabs explored about 1,000 vaults on this site alone, which were aligned.[72]
The first necropolises of Carthage are located on the hills of Byrsa, Juno, Dermech, and Douimès from the 8th to the 5th century BC. From the 4th century BC, necropolises occupy the hills of the theater, the odeon, and Sainte-Monique, but also areas closer to the sea, like at Ard el-Khéraïb.[71]
Access to the chambers is either through pits or through dromos-type accesses.[50] The ceiling of the richest tombs may have a wooden paneling, as in the tomb of Yada'milk,[73] made of various wood species from the forests of Kroumirie[74] or Cyrenaica but with rot-resistant properties.[75]
From the 6th century BC, pit tombs appear in Carthage, with varying depths. According to Abdelmajid Ennabli, the necropolis of the Rabs is occupied from the 5th to the 2nd century BC but especially in the 4th-3rd centuries BC. One-third of the tombs date from the 4th century, and two-thirds from the 3rd century.[72] According to Salah-Eddine Tlatli , the necropolis of the hill of Sainte-Monique is dated to the 3rd century BC.[76] The pits are on average 12 meters deep in this necropolis but can be much deeper, up to 27 meters.[77] Notches made in the pit allow people wishing to go up or down to place their feet.[78] The depth of the pits is a matter of security against thieves but also of prestige, or even obeys religious motives.[79]
The access bay to the funeral chambers, measuring 1.32 m by 0.63 m, may have a console carved into the rock.[80] The tombs were dug with more or less care.[81] The floor can be made of rock, beaten earth, or sand.[82] The walls of the funeral chambers are carefully cut, coated with stucco sometimes with marble powder.[83]
The necropolises evolve over time, with areas reserved "for religious colleges, families, or clans." Tombs thus pass from an individual character to a collective one.[84] The pits can therefore gradually have several funeral chambers, intended, for example, for couples. These chambers measure 2.20 m by 2.80 m with a height of 1.90 m.[85]
The location of the burial is marked by a stone or a cippus,[85] with or without inscriptions intended to "perpetuate the memory of the deceased."[86] The "external monuments" had disappeared during the excavations.[87] There may have been monumental buildings in the necropolis,[88] mausoleums like those of Dougga, Sabratha, or the Medracen, among other examples that have survived; indeed, architectural elements were found during excavations at the site of Ard el-Khéraïb or Byrsa.[89] Alfred Louis Delattre described a building covering several funeral pits.[90] The city may have had quarries nearby during antiquity; stones could be transported from the Cape Bon quarries across the Gulf of Tunis and then cut on site.[91]
Anthropomorphic stelae used from the 4th century BC have also been found,[89] depicting a person in a prayerful attitude.[92] The tombs are dug taking into account the nature of the rock.[56] Some walls are decorated with stucco coatings, and Alfred Louis Delattre noted a cornice at the entrance of a chamber or even inside the chambers.[93]
Funeral inscriptions have been found especially in the "aristocratic quarter of the City of the Dead."[94] These epitaphs are sometimes engraved on slabs embedded at the entrance of the tombs[89] and intended to close them, on stone tablets embedded in the shape of a "rectangular parallelepiped," which are "remarkable specimens of Punic calligraphy."[95]
Punic necropolises
editThe Punic tombs that have been identified, numbering over 3,500, are relatively scattered throughout the city and form a kind of arc in the middle of which the habitat was located:
- southern flank of the hill of Byrsa;
- northern area of the current park of the Baths of Antoninus, with tombs dating before the 6th century BC;[96]
- space occupied by the current park of Roman villas, the area of the odeon, and the hill of Juno;
- hill of Bordj Djedid and Sainte-Monique with the necropolis called "of the Rabs" (from which the two sarcophagi of the priest and the priestess come), used from the 5th-4th centuries BC until the destruction of the Punic city.[97]
Their excavations, which gave rise to worldly ceremonies at the end of the 19th century,[98] yielded significant material: ceramics, masks, and various small objects revealing Egyptian influences, with Hellenic influence becoming increasingly marked from the 5th-4th centuries BC. A large part of the excavations concerns mainly burials from the 7th century BC.[99] The ancient burials were reused in the 5th century before new spaces were consecrated to the dead, according to the same arc scheme, the places being located intra muros.[100]
Two types of burials must be distinguished, one located at the bottom of sometimes deep pits of about thirty meters and containing various funeral chambers, the other consisting of buildings of the "tomb with dromos" type. A special place must be made for the tophet, which has the particularity of being both a cemetery and a sanctuary.
Roman and Byzantine necropolises
editUnlike Punic necropolises, those from the Roman period were located outside the city limits. Accessible and easily transportable, the elevated elements were most often destroyed or reused. As a result, few funeral elements remain visible today.
Recent excavations have highlighted several cemeteries, including that of the officiales, reserved for officials of the proconsular administration near the cisterns of La Malga.[101]
Mausoleums with bas-relief stuccoed were formerly uncovered in the same sector and deposited at the National Museum of Bardo.[102]
Public buildings
editFrom the powerful public constructions of the Punic period mentioned in the texts we have (citadel of Byrsa and agora near the ports), no trace has survived the centuries. The existing remains mainly concern the Roman period, particularly the most important monuments of "African Rome," remains that, despite their presence, are little indicative of the past greatness of the city.
- Ruins of some public buildings
-
Ruins of the odeon.
-
Part of the foundations of the Antonine Baths.
-
Aerial view of the theater in 1950.
-
Roman terracing of the Byrsa hill.
Byrsa in Roman times
editThe hill of Byrsa saw extensive urbanization works from the beginning of the Roman colony, with the groma of the new African Rome located at the summit. The large platform was occupied by the elements of the forum, capitol, and civil and judicial basilicas built from the birth of the Roman colony. A curia and a tabularium completed the monumental adornment of the hill.[103]
The latest research (notably by Pierre Gros) has highlighted the eminently political character of the monumental adornment of the Colonia Iulia and the time lag between these constructions and the expansion of private buildings.[103]
However, excavations are very difficult on such a surface, the site being occupied by the Cathedral Saint-Louis and the former buildings of the White Fathers’ convent.[104]
A watercolor showing the Romans’ leveling works on the hill, as well as a model of the forum, are visible at the National Museum of Carthage. The preserved remains in the archaeological garden area are extremely limited, the most telling being those of the apses discovered by Beulé and those of a basilica on the eastern flank of the hill.
Theater and odeon
editThe theater from the 2nd century underwent significant restoration, with the Roman-era remains being very modest. Of the building designed to accommodate 5,000 spectators, only weak ruins remained at the beginning of the 20th century, both of the tiers and the stage or the frons scaenae.
The building is of an intermediate type between the Greek theater, whose structure was dug into the ground, and the Roman theater, often built on open ground.[105] Excavations revealed an early destruction by the Vandals,[106] followed by occupation of the site by an indigent population. It is hard to imagine that this building could have aroused the admiration of authors like Apuleius due to the richness of the marbles and various decorative elements.
This deliberate will to destroy in order to recover materials confirms the qualifier attributed to the people responsible for such acts by the Abbé Grégoire. However, many statues were discovered there, now deposited at the National Museum of Bardo,[107] including the famous "Apollo". At the beginning of the 20th century, the theater served for various performances, notably plays in antique-inspired costumes. Historical speeches were also delivered there, including by Winston Churchill during World War II.[108] Nowadays, the place hosts the International Festival of Carthage every year.
Of the odeon, only a few remains survive. Their state allows one to realize the restoration work carried out on the theater, which is adjacent to it, to give it its current appearance. Excavations were undertaken from 1994 to 1999 on this building, whose structure was entirely built. We know from a text by Tertullian that its construction dates from the reign of Septimius Severus.[109]
Baths of Antoninus
editThe Baths of Antoninus were built by the sea after a large fire that ravaged the city in the 2nd century, more precisely between 145 and 162.[110] Even though the building constitutes the most important thermal complex in Carthage, it was not the only one, although no elevated part of similar buildings remains. Restorations took place after an earthquake in the 4th century.
After the collapse of part of the vaults of the frigidarium at the end of the 4th century or the beginning of the 5th century, the building continued to be used, with disuse dating from 638 according to Alexandre Lézine.[111] He worked particularly with Gilbert Charles-Picard during the post-war period on the clearance, study, and enhancement of the ruins within the archaeological park. Only a few vestiges of the ground floor, consisting of service spaces near the shore, remain from the original installations.[112] The baths served as a stone quarry for centuries, and we owe to them numerous monuments in Tunis and many cities in the northern Mediterranean basin, such as Pisa.[113]
Abdelmajid Ennabli and Hédi Slim have said the building was no more than "a colossus felled and stripped[30] of almost all its architectural and ornamental elements."[112] Moreover, the topography of the place has changed considerably since antiquity, with humans having drained an initially marshy area, and the shoreline being much less clear than it is now.[114] Furthermore, the level of the Mediterranean Sea has risen by about fifty centimeters, engulfing part of the remains, including the swimming pool. The ruins extend over a length of more than 200 meters along the coastline. The anastylosis of a column of the frigidarium by a Tunisian archaeological mission during the international campaign led by UNESCO (1972-1992) gives an idea of the magnificence of the place at the height of the Roman city,[115] with the disappeared vaults rising to a height of over 29 meters, equivalent to a six-story building.[116]
Amphitheater and circus
editOf the amphitheater with a capacity of 30,000 people, which would have seen the martyrdom of Saints Perpetua and Felicity on March 7, 203,[17][117] — a tradition according to all likelihood erroneous, researchers agreeing to place this event in another location, an amphitheatrum castrense whose location is unknown[118] — only the arena remains, the rest having disappeared due to monument looters who plagued Carthage for over a millennium. One can hardly rely on the enthusiastic descriptions of medieval visitors, including Al Idrissi: "At the top of each arch is a round cartouche, and on those of the lower arcade, one sees various figures and curious representations of men, artisans, ships, sculpted on stone with infinite art. The upper arcades are polished and devoid of ornaments."[27]
A similar fate was reserved for the circus, which is now only suggested by a long depression near Douar Chott; a road now crosses it. The excavations of the American team within the framework of the UNESCO archaeological mission allow us to suppose a capacity of 60,000 spectators.[101]
They also demonstrated a late occupation (7th century) by an indigent population, as the burials indicate manifest malnutrition.[119]
Columned building
editLocated on the hill of Juno, this building corresponded to an unknown function. Archaeologists have uncovered twinned Corinthian columns, while the floor is paved with mosaics.[120] They consider two hypotheses for its use as a civil building: either as a civil basilica, or as a palaestra of the so-called "Gargilius" thermes, of which it would be the last vestige.[121]
A religious activity has been determined for the Byzantine period, with some historians agreeing to make it one of the essential places during the condemnation of Donatism by Saint Augustine in 411.[122]
Near the monument, the mosaic of the horses was uncovered in November 1960,[123] exhibited in the archaeological park of Roman villas.
Religious buildings
editOf the buildings with a religious vocation, only tenuous traces remain from incompletely conducted excavations. From the Punics, there is no element of what was their main sanctuary according to the texts, the Temple of Eshmun (Carthage) , near the citadel. The remains that survived after the destruction of the Third Punic War disappeared during the Roman development of the hill of Byrsa. However, the sacred area of the tophet remains, with both a funeral and votive character. Nothing remains from Roman Carthage and the main temples located on the capitol, even though some cult statues have survived the centuries.
The Late Antiquity has left a number of basilicas which, with the advent of Christianity and during the episcopate of the bishops of Carthage (including the famous Saint Cyprian), replaced pagan temples when they were not destroyed.[124] They were extensively explored by the White Fathers from the end of the 19th century to the mid-20th century and sometimes underwent untimely restorations, particularly on the occasion of the 1930 jubilee.
- Vestiges with a religious character
-
Mosaic of victorious auriges bearing Greek inscriptions.
-
Basilica of Damous El Karita with the Mâlik ibn Anas Mosque in the background.
-
View of the lower level of the rotunda of Damous El Karita.
-
Basilica and baptistery of Douimès.
-
Part of the Tophet of Salammbô site.
-
Stelae located under Roman vaults.
Tophet of Salammbô
editThe tophet, located not far from the Punic ports, is a sacred enclosure where the Carthaginians would have sacrificed their children to the protective deities Tanit and Ba'al Hammon according to a well-established historiography but questioned by some specialists, particularly Sabatino Moscati.[125] Following ancient authors and a romantic vision favored by Flaubert's novel, a number of researchers believed they recognized in this place the proof of this tradition.
Discovered in 1921 by Paul Gielly and François Icard, the space saw excavations interrupted and resumed several times by various teams, the latest investigations being those of Lawrence E. Stager, who places himself in the tradition of the sacrificial place.[126] From the first picks, the remains confirmed the prevailing hypothesis. The stele of the priest with the child weighed heavily in the interpretation. However, medicine has not been able to certify to date that the children buried there were victims of sacrifices, especially since non-human bones were discovered there. These analyses pose more interpretation problems than they provide answers. In any case, the ashes of burned children — beyond the causes of death — were collected in urns and then buried under cippi or votive stelae. When the space was filled, it was backfilled, thus forming a new layer.[127]
Archaeologists have determined three types in the depositions found (Tanit I, Tanit II, and Tanit III), each style characterized by its own features and stelae with marked differences, both in form and in any decoration. A constant must be noted, that of the use of astral symbols and the sign of Tanit.
Similarly, the inscriptions are stereotyped,[128] indicating a dedication for a vow or a thanksgiving following a fulfilled vow. The well-known image of the tophet is constituted by the stelae under vaults which are, however, later, dating from the Roman period. However, the current presentation of the site, even if it is heterogeneous and artificial, mainly highlights ancient stelae made of sandstone from El Haouaria and a small number of later, more worked but more fragile stelae, as they are made of limestone. They are mostly exhibited at the National Museum of Carthage. In Roman times, this space served other uses: warehouses, pottery kilns, and houses, but one also notes a sanctuary dedicated to Saturn, the Roman equivalent of Ba'al Hammon and the main deity of the African pantheon.
Complex of the Basilica of Carthagenna and paleo-Christian quarter
editThe quarter called "Carthagenna" was that of "the old ports of the city and the surrounding lands" according to Father Delattre. The southern part of this quarter is now called "Salammbô." The quarter dating from Late Antiquity was cleared by archaeologists. Two buildings succeeded each other there, including a columned building from the end of the 4th century. Its religious, more precisely Christian, function was determined by its decoration. It is therefore a unique case of a known church in Carthage for that period.[129]
This place also houses a large paleo-Christian basilica with five naves and two apses, built in the 6th century, to which a baptistery was added. A number of remains related to the building allow interpreting the whole as an ecclesiastical complex.[130]
A small museum was built to preserve some objects from the site or its surroundings. Among other remarkable elements are a mosaic bearing Greek inscriptions, the mosaic known as the Greek auriges, which gave its name to the villa where it was found, and a statuette representing Ganymede, discovered broken in a cistern, probably broken during its installation and immediately thrown into the place from which it was exhumed.[131]
Basilica of Damous El Karita
editThe Basilica of Damous El Karita, on the plateau of the odeon, was cleared in 1878 by Father Delattre, one of the first to have excavated the site.[132] It is the first Christian monument discovered in Carthage, and it is assumed that the current name comes from a deformation of the Latin domus caritatis (house of charity).
Intensive research to find tombs and paleo-Christian inscriptions stripped the monument, and its remains are hardly impressive.[133] Moreover, excavated down to the virgin soil, it underwent untimely restorations in 1930. Fortunately, earlier documents allowed identifying the various phases of the building, whose first state seems to date from the end of the 4th century.[134] An immense building at the beginning (measuring 65 meters by 45 with nine naves and eleven bays for the central space), the site consists, in addition to the basilica, of a baptistery and a complex that may have housed monks. In its last state, the monument is greatly reduced (three naves and five bays only), denoting a strong degradation.[135]
Near the remains, one can observe a circular monument partly underground, which some archaeologists believe was intended to honor martyrs.[136] For others, following Father Delattre, and up to the last excavator of the site within the international campaign, Stefan Boyadjiev, it is a baptistery. Others still see it as having a funeral purpose.[135] The building has never been subjected to exhaustive excavations and remains poorly known. Research nevertheless allows noting that it has an underground rotunda, formerly topped by a dome, accessed by two staircases,[137] suggesting an organized circulation of individuals.[135] In the immediate vicinity, the Mâlik ibn Anas Mosque was built, inaugurated in 2003.
Basilica of Saint Cyprian
editOn the plateau of Borj Djedid, the basilica known as Saint Cyprian was cleared. This vast construction was found in 1915 and identified as the Basilica of Saint Cyprian thanks to a text by Saint Augustine that located it "in front of the city, near the sea."[138]
Consisting of seven naves, the monument was surrounded by a vast cemetery. Here, but in an earlier building, Saint Monica, mother of Saint Augustine, would have spent the night before his departure for Italy.[138]
Benefiting from an exceptional panorama over the Gulf of Tunis and Jebel Boukornine, these remains have been the subject of important excavations, with the removal of ancient slabs and pavements, as well as restoration on the occasion of the jubilee organized in Carthage in 1930 with heterogeneous anastyloses.[139]
The facade accessing the building was near the ravine overlooking the sea, on a site likely dedicated to the safety of sailors for a long time. It is assumed that the body of Saint Cyprian was deposited there, which could explain the long use of the building from the end of the 4th century, including during the Vandal period.[140]
Basilica Majorum
editOn the site called "Mcidfa," a building identified as the Basilica Majorum was uncovered since its discovery in 1906-1909 by Father Delattre. Its use as a pagan cemetery from the 1st century would confirm the hypothesis that it is the basilica maiorum, the burial place of Saints Perpetua and Felicity after their martyrdom. An inscription mentioning the presence of the bodies of the martyrs was found there, which we know from a text by Victor of Vita were buried in said basilica.[141] Saint Augustine preached several sermons there.[142] Moreover, a text by the same Victor of Vita tells us that the church was requisitioned by the Vandals and destined for Arian worship, with the building being returned to Catholicism certainly during the Byzantine period. The abandonment of this place is proven at the beginning of the 7th century, due to the shrinkage of the urban fabric in its immediate environment.[143] As for the identification of this monument with the "Perpetua Restituta,"[142] that is, the Catholic basilica of the city, it is not at all proven, with archaeologists having no material element in their possession to date.
Archaeologists have dated this construction to the beginning of the 4th century.[144] The uncovered building consisted of seven naves and thirteen bays; it underwent some transformations under Byzantine domination. Over-excavated, it now presents only column shafts and some surviving walls, not very impressive. This is because it was systematically destroyed.[145]
Already, Father Delattre had noted its poor state, due according to him to the reuse of materials in neighboring habitations.[146] That is why, apart from the other elements of the site, these few remains are left almost abandoned.
Basilicas of Douimès
editThe two basilicas called "of Douimès" (a word meaning "vaults") are currently in the archaeological park of the Baths of Antoninus.[147] They were relatively well-preserved when discovered, but the exhibition set up on the site of the basilicas led to very significant degradation of both the structures and the mosaics, due to water runoff and tourist traffic.
The first building, dating from the beginning of the Byzantine period and discovered relatively damaged, included three naves. In its immediate archaeological environment were a Christian cemetery and a Punic tomb from the 5th century BC.[148]
The second basilica was larger, with its five naves and two sacristies. In addition, a baptistery and another element that probably served as a martyrium, a place where worship was rendered to saints, were attached to it.[114]
Infrastructure
editThe infrastructure of ancient Carthage is relatively well known for the Roman period. The cadastre and centuriation of the space have been the subject of very comprehensive studies. As early as 1833, the consul of Denmark in Tunis, C. T. Falbe, made the first surveys, but other historians of Carthage are not left out, with a long list of works devoted to the subject.[149] At the same time, the organization of the Roman city is fairly well reconstructed. As for the infrastructure of the Punic period, it is little known, apart from a number of cisterns, and mainly concerns the Punic ports, long identified with two lagoons. From the Roman period, the 18 cisterns that constituted the outlet of the Zaghouan Aqueduct to supply the Antonine Baths are particularly impressive.
- Elements of the city's infrastructure
-
Internal view of the pipeline leading to the cisterns of La Malga.
-
Ruins of the aqueduct from Zaghouan.
-
Former Punic ports dominated by the Cathedral Saint-Louis.
-
Dry dock of the Admiralty islet.
Punic ports
editThe question of the ports of the city of Carthage is fundamental, given the importance of the maritime world for the Phoenicians. The two current lagoons along the shore, called one "commercial port"[150] and the other "military port"[151] — with the islet called "of the admiralty" in its center, where a dry dock has been highlighted — are perhaps not the essential place that was wanted to be seen there following the assertions of Chateaubriand at the beginning of the 19th century and the abusive interpretation of a text by Appian.[152] The surface of the lagoons, eight hectares for the military port and double for the second, has cast doubt on whether these were the ports of the proud rival of Rome.[153] Indeed, it is attested that the Carthaginians left their ships on the shore at the beginning of their history, but probably also later. The lagoons might only be the cothon of the Punic city in the last half-century of its existence.[154] Around the military port and on the islet, wintering docks were deployed, the number of which has been estimated at about 170.[155] No trace of the navarch’s pavilion is currently visible.
The port quarter was remodeled in Roman times with the development of a public square, surrounded by a colonnade, in the middle of which stood two buildings, including a temple.
Commercial activity remained paramount there, particularly for loading wheat ships destined for the annona.[101]
Cisterns of La Malga
editIn the Punic period, there were modest cisterns, as water supply was a private matter. Many Punic cisterns have survived the centuries and allow researchers to work on the density of settlement in the ancient city, particularly in the Megara quarter. Only one hydraulic facility is known, the "fountain with a thousand amphorae", now inaccessible to visitors because it is in the security zone of the presidential palace.
To the north of the Roman city are large, relatively well-preserved cisterns. They formed the main arrival point of the aqueducts that supplied the city, including the famous Zaghouan Aqueduct. A museum has been installed there to show the functioning of these hydraulic installations. The large cisterns, whose capacity has been estimated between 50,000 and 60,000 cubic meters, were connected to the vast complex of the Antonine Baths by mostly underground pipelines using the steep slope of the terrain.[101][156]
Major archaeological pieces found in Carthage
editFrom the end of the 19th century, the products of excavations carried out in Carthage are mainly shared[157] between the Lavigerie Museum (current National Museum of Carthage) and the Alaoui Museum (National Museum of Bardo). The excavations carried out by the White Fathers did not leave the city, while the research of the antiquities service ended up at the Bardo. Other archaeological pieces, particularly part of those from the Serapeum of Carthage , were deposited at the National Museum of Antiquities and Islamic Art.
National Museum of Carthage
editThe National Museum of Carthage is located near the cathedral, in the premises formerly occupied by the White Fathers. It allows visitors to measure the extent of what the city's installations were in the Punic and then Roman periods.[158]
One can see some of the most beautiful pieces discovered in excavations since the 19th century, notably an important collection of baetyls and steles from the Tophet of Salammbô — limestone stelae depicting sculpted elements, animals, plants, or even humans, are particularly remarkable — the marble sarcophagi known as "of the priest" and "of the priestess" (3rd century BC) found in the necropolis "of the Rabs," funeral material such as masks with apotropaic motifs and glass paste jewelry, Roman mosaics, including the "Lady of Carthage ", traditionally considered as the portrait of a Byzantine empress;[159] carved elements characteristic of official imperial art, particularly the head known as "of Julia" and representations of Victories from the 2nd century, as well as a vast collection of Roman amphorae.
- Pieces at the National Museum of Carthage
-
Punic stele with an elephant.
-
Roman imperial statue.
-
Sarcophagi of the priest and the priestess.
-
Oil lamps and Punic ceramics.
National Museum of Bardo
editA large number of major pieces discovered in Carthage are now exhibited at the National Museum of Bardo, formerly called the Alaoui Museum and inaugurated in 1882. Known mainly for the richness of its Roman-era mosaics, the museum also possesses some of the most interesting Punic pieces that have come down to us; the Mosaic of Dominus Julius, illustrating life on an agricultural estate in the 4th century BC, has been considered the most complete document on the economy and society of Roman Africa.[160] On three superimposed registers, both the activities of the agricultural estate in different seasons and those of the owners of the place are described. The dimensions of the building represented in the center of the composition testify to the concentration of economic power in the hands of a small number of landowners in Late Antiquity.
The stele of the priest with the child, coming from the Tophet, shows a character wearing the traditional hat of Punic priests carrying a child in his arms. This discovery in 1921 was the starting point of a vast controversy, with some historians wanting to see in it a concretization of the multiple ancient sources evoking the sacrifice of children to the deities Tanit and Ba'al Hammon. The statue of Apollo in white marble from the Cyclades, coming from the theater and depicting the god leaning nonchalantly on a tripod from Delphi around which the serpent Python coils,[161] and a mausoleum found in the cemetery of the officiales and adorned with bas-reliefs[162] are among the most striking pieces, as well as the altar of the Gens Augusta, found near the hill of Byrsa, which takes up on a lesser level the themes put on the agenda by the Ara Pacis, referring to the ancestry of Aeneas and highlighting the virtues, notably religious, of the emperor.[163]
- Pieces at the Bardo National Museum
-
Apollo discovered at the Carthage theater.
-
Stele of the priest with the child discovered in 1921.
-
Altar of the Gens Augusta.
-
Reconstituted mausoleum.
Current issues: coexistence between the ancient city and the modern city
editPreservation and classification of the site
editFaced with the threat of degradation hanging over Carthage, the Director-General of UNESCO, René Maheu, went to the site on May 19, 1972, and launched an international appeal for its protection:
"[...] Even if nothing capital or spectacular were to be found, it is beautiful, it is good, that in this place [...] gathers, coming from all horizons of the world, the great fraternity of those for whom there is no nobler and more enriching quest than that of the truth about man. To the harsh voice, issuing from the depths of ages which, in each people, tirelessly repeats its message of hatred and which once said Carthage must be destroyed!, let us oppose the call of the future, itself as old as humanity, which has guided it out of darkness. It is the voice of concord, of that Concord under whose sign Augustus built the city that erased the ruins of Scipio. And it is by thinking of our future even more than of our past, of that future so threatened by ourselves, that we say today: We must save Carthage! Together, we will save it."[164][165]
Following this appeal, an international campaign was immediately set up and lasted until 1992[166] with the objective, according to the Tunisian archaeologist and historian Abdelmajid Ennabli, to "first excavate, study, then publish, of course, but also consolidate, enhance these remains and make them accessible to the public".[167] During the campaign, the Tunisian government had the site inscribed on the World Heritage List in 1979, on the occasion of the third session of the World Heritage Committee, which took place in Egypt, more precisely in Luxor and Cairo. Subsequently, a classification plan was approved by decree of the President of Tunisia on October 7, 1985:[168] "It is clear that the expected decision goes far beyond the technical and budgetary level. The Carthage-Sidi Bou Saïd park is an act of protection and enhancement of national and world heritage; it is also an act of development and as such, it is also a political act, and it is this political choice that is hoped for".[169]
Current threats
editYet, despite the various preservation measures, the site remains today subject to various pressures from its environment that threaten its sustainability. A depopulated suburb of Tunis at the beginning of the 20th century, Carthage is largely endangered by the rapid urbanization of the 1950s and 1960s, particularly the demographic expansion of Greater Tunis, which has grown from 300,000 to more than two million inhabitants since the end of World War II[170]
The proximity of the Carthage Palace built at the end of the 1950s and the prestige of the name of the ancient city make it an "emblematic place of power", according to Sophie Bessis,[170] and a highly sought-after quarter, particularly by embassies. Many villas are also built there. However, in the face of this surge, some scientists are moved to see the site condemned to be, at best, inaccessible to researchers and, at worst, a victim of concrete mixers.
The research carried out within the framework of the UNESCO mission, the establishment of site protection are not sufficient, even if they are necessary. Danger still looms, as declassification procedures have led to a reduction of the non aedificandi zone and to constructions sometimes at the gates of the most emblematic places, including the area of the Punic ports.[170] Similarly, the creation of the Mâlik ibn Anas Mosque could fuel controversy due to its location on the odeon hill.
However, urbanization is not the only threat weighing on the conservation of the site. The objects preserved in museums are not safe, as evidenced by the theft in November 2013 of the statuary group Statue of Ganymede, discovered in 1977 in the House of the Greek Charioteers, within its place of conservation, the Carthage Paleo-Christian Museum.
The lack of suitable means for the stabilization and maintenance of the ruins, their destruction by erosion and runoff, as well as their overexploitation by the tourist sector, constitute problems that Tunisian institutional actors must face. This is not the least of the paradoxes or dilemmas: Carthage will only be saved if awareness is as broad as possible, this awareness can only be achieved through knowledge of the site.
At the same time, for the country, the presence on its territory of such a heritage — not only the remains but also the importance of Carthage in the memory of humanity — makes it one of the major assets of the Tunisian tourist economy, one of the engines of national development.
References
edit- ^ Lancel 1999, p. 8
- ^ Slim & Fauqué 2001, p. 34
- ^ Decret 1977, p. 55
- ^ Slim & Fauqué 2001, pp. 33–34
- ^ a b c Dureau de la Malle, Adolphe (1835). Recherches sur la topographie de Carthage [Research on the topography of Carthage] (in French). Paris: Impr. de Firmin-Didot frères. pp. 245–297.
- ^ Adolphe Dureau de la Malle, op. cit., p. 246.
- ^ Adolphe, Étienne Jules (1853). Histoire des progrès de la géologie de 1834 à 1852 [History of geological progress from 1834 to 1852] (in French). Vol. V. Paris: Société géologique de France. p. 434.
- ^ This term "melting pot" is particularly validated by archaeological evidence shifting from a strong Egyptian influence in the 7th-6th centuries BC (see on this subject the work by Cintas, Pierre (1946). Amulettes puniques [Punic amulets] (in French). Tunis: Institut des hautes études de Tunis. p. 171.) to a Hellenic influence in the 4th century BC.
- ^ "Gustave Flaubert : Salammbô". jb.guinot.pagesperso-orange.fr (in French). Archived from the original on 2020-11-12.
- ^ Decret 1977, p. 7
- ^ Polybius, Histories, III, V.
- ^ Dridi 2006, p. 56
- ^ Ben Abed, Aïcha (1995). "Carthage : capitale de l'Africa" [Carthage: capital of Africa]. Connaissance des Arts (in French) (69 (special issue)): 28. ISSN 0293-9274.
- ^ Collectif 1995, p. 33
- ^ a b Decret 1977, p. 292
- ^ Herodian, History of the Roman Emperors from Marcus Aurelius to Gordian III, VII, XXIV.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Decret, François (October 2008). "Carthage chrétienne" [Christian Carthage]. clio.fr (in French). Retrieved 28 May 2020.
- ^ Bejaoui, Fethi (1995). "La Carthage de saint Augustin" [Saint Augustine's Carthage]. Connaissance des Arts (in French) (69 (special issue)): 55. ISSN 0293-9274.
- ^ Aïcha Ben Abed, op. cit., p. 44.
- ^ Fethi Bejaoui, op. cit., pp. 55–56.
- ^ Abdelmajid Ennabli, "Carthage," Encyclopædia Universalis, Paris, 2002, p. 1041 ISBN 2-85229-550-4.
- ^ Liliane Ennabli, "Carthage chrétienne" [Christian Carthage] (in French), Encyclopædia Universalis, Paris, 2002.
- ^ Pellegrin, Arthur (1975). Histoire de la Tunisie [History of Tunisia] (in French). Tunis: Bouslama. p. 132.
- ^ Hassine Fantar 1995, p. 8
- ^ Louis Carton, La Tunisie illustrée [Illustrated Tunisia] (in French), February 1921, cited by Hassine Fantar 1995, p. 10
- ^ Al-Bakri (1965). Description de l'Afrique septentrionale [Description of North Africa] (in French). Translated by William Mac Guckin de Slane. Paris: Adrien-Maisonneuve. pp. 93–405. cited by Hassine Fantar 1995, p. 8
- ^ a b Al Idrissi (1866). Description de l'Afrique et de l'Espagne [Description of Africa and Spain] (in French). Translated by Reinhart Pieter Anne Dozy and Michael Jan de Goeje. Leiden: Brill. pp. 133–391. ISBN 978-0-598-96641-4., cited by Hassine Fantar 1995, p. 10
- ^ Hassine Fantar 1995, p. 12
- ^ Charles Ernest Beulé (1861). Fouilles à Carthage [Excavations in Carthage] (in French). Paris: Imprimerie impériale. pp. 84–143. cited by Hassine Fantar 1995, p. 13
- ^ a b Beschaouch 1993, p. 94
- ^ Lipinski 1992, p. 128
- ^ Beylical decrees of November 7, 1882, and March 8, 1885.
- ^ Serge Lancel, "Problèmes d'urbanisme de la Carthage punique," Collectif 1990, p. 29
- ^ Lipinski 1992, p. 93
- ^ Beschaouch 1993, pp. 90–92
- ^ "Summary of the work of the international teams that worked in Carthage. 1973-1994," Collectif 1995, p. 119
- ^ Slim & Fauqué 2001, p. 33
- ^ Lipinski 1992, p. 94
- ^ Serge Lancel and Jean-Paul Morel, "Byrsa. Les vestiges puniques," Collectif 1992, pp. 43–59
- ^ a b Hassine Fantar 1995, p. 40
- ^ Friedrich Rakob, "L'habitat ancien et le système urbanistique" [Old housing and the urban planning system] (in French), Collectif 1992, pp. 29–37
- ^ Picard 1951, p. 45
- ^ Picard 1951, p. 44
- ^ Sébastien Storz, "La Kobba Bent el Rey," Collectif 1992, p. 157
- ^ Lipinski 1992, p. 92
- ^ Amadasi Guzzo 2007, pp. 78–79
- ^ Lancel 1999, pp. 79–80
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 238
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 335
- ^ a b Amadasi Guzzo 2007, p. 79
- ^ Slim & Fauqué 2001, p. 69
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 258
- ^ Lancel 1999, p. 306
- ^ Amadasi Guzzo 2007, p. 80
- ^ a b c Hours-Médian 1982, p. 81
- ^ a b Cintas 1976, p. 358
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 259
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, pp. 273–275
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 340
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, pp. 277–278
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 281
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 283
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 285
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, pp. 283–287
- ^ Hassine Fantar 1998, p. 158
- ^ Cintas 1976, pp. 358–359
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 250
- ^ Tlatli 1978, p. 229
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 8
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 14
- ^ a b Hassine Fantar 1998, p. 155
- ^ a b Ennabli 2020, p. 174
- ^ Amadasi Guzzo 2007, pp. 79–80
- ^ Lancel 1999, p. 73
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 162
- ^ Tlatli 1978, pp. 223–224
- ^ Cintas 1976, pp. 357–358
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, pp. 89–90
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, pp. 92–93
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, pp. 113–115
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 121
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 122
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 160
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, pp. 249–250
- ^ a b Tlatli 1978, p. 217
- ^ Cintas 1976, p. 359
- ^ Tlatli 1978, p. 223
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 80
- ^ a b c Hassine Fantar 1998, p. 159
- ^ Cintas 1976, pp. 360–361
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 165
- ^ Hours-Médian 1982, pp. 81–82
- ^ Hassine Fantar 1998, pp. 157–158
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, pp. 173–174
- ^ Bénichou-Safar 1982, p. 175
- ^ Picard 1951, p. 39
- ^ Picard 1951, pp. 57–59
- ^ Lancel 1999, p. 71
- ^ Lipinski 1992, pp. 92–93
- ^ Hassine Fantar 1995, p. 49
- ^ a b c d Le Bohec 2005, p. 118
- ^ Ennabli & Rebourg 1993, p. 32
- ^ a b Le Bohec 2005, p. 117
- ^ Pierre Gros, "Colline de Byrsa. Les vestiges romains," Collectif 1992, pp. 99–103
- ^ Le Roy, Max (1965). Initiation à l'archéologie romaine (in French). Paris: Payot. pp. 47–50.
- ^ According to Victor of Vita cited by Picard 1951, p. 43
- ^ Ennabli & Rebourg 1993, p. 49
- ^ Ennabli & Rebourg 1993, p. 50
- ^ Hugoniot 2000, p. 293
- ^ Picard 1951, p. 51
- ^ Lézine 1969, p. 41
- ^ a b Ennabli & Rebourg 1993, p. 39
- ^ Beschaouch 1993, pp. 42–43
- ^ a b Picard 1951, p. 47
- ^ Vérité, Jacques (1985). Thermes d'Antonin: anastyloses au frigidarium, rapport technique no. 4 [Baths of Antoninus: anastyloses in the frigidarium, technical report no. 4] (PDF) (in French). Paris: UNESCO. p. 23.
- ^ Alexandre Lézine (1968). Carthage-Utique (in French). Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique. pp. 20–203.
- ^ Hugoniot 2000, p. 188
- ^ Abdelmajid Ennabli, "La campagne internationale de Carthage" [The Carthage international campaign] (in French), Collectif 1995, p. 116
- ^ Naomi Norman, "Le cirque romain" [The Roman circus] (in French), Collectif 1992, pp. 161–164
- ^ Picard 1951, p. 37
- ^ Ennabli & Rebourg 1993, pp. 46–47
- ^ Ennabli & Rebourg 1993, p. 47
- ^ Salomonson, Jan Willem (1965). La mosaïque aux chevaux de l'antiquarium de Carthage [The horse mosaic at the Carthage antiquarium] (in French). The Hague: Imprimerie nationale. pp. 7–208.
- ^ Victor Guérin (1862). Voyage archéologique dans la régence de Tunis [Archaeological tour of the Tunis Regency] (in French). Vol. I. Paris: Plon. pp. 61–438.
- ^ Beschaouch 1993, p. 80
- ^ Beschaouch 1993, pp. 79–80
- ^ Lipinski 1992, p. 463
- ^ Lancel 1999, p. 340
- ^ Ennabli 1997, p. 61
- ^ Ennabli 1997, p. 68
- ^ John H. Humphrey, "Pied du versant est de Byrsa. L'évolution d'un quartier" [Foot of the eastern slope of Byrsa. The evolution of a neighborhood] (in French), Collectif 1992, pp. 165–176
- ^ Ennabli 1997, pp. 121–122
- ^ Ennabli & Rebourg 1993, p. 55
- ^ Ennabli 1997, pp. 123–126
- ^ a b c Ennabli 1997, p. 127
- ^ Pierre Seney, "Le monument circulaire" [The circular monument] (in French), Collectif 1992, pp. 104–113
- ^ Picard 1951, p. 66
- ^ a b Picard 1951, p. 62
- ^ Ennabli & Rebourg 1993, p. 59
- ^ Ennabli 1997, p. 131
- ^ Ennabli 1997, pp. 132–133
- ^ a b Adolphe Dureau de la Malle, op. cit., p. 217.
- ^ Ennabli 1997, p. 135
- ^ Le Bohec 2005, p. 221
- ^ Arnauld, Dominique (2001). "Les sept premiers siècles" [The first seven centuries]. Histoire du christianisme en Afrique [History of Christianity in Africa] (in French). Paris: Karthala. pp. 299–378. ISBN 978-2-845-86190-9.
- ^ Ennabli 1997, p. 133
- ^ Ennabli & Rebourg 1993, pp. 44–45
- ^ Picard 1951, p. 46
- ^ Pol Trousset, "Les centuriations romaines" [Roman centuriations] (in French), Collectif 1995, pp. 70–79
- ^ Lawrence E. Stager, "Le tophet et le port commercial" [The tophet and the commercial port] (in French), Collectif 1992, pp. 73–78
- ^ Henry Hurst, "L’îlot de l’amirauté, le port circulaire et l’avenue Bourguibal" [Admiralty island, circular port and avenue Bourguibal] (in French), Collectif 1992, pp. 79–94
- ^ Appian, Libyca, 96, cited by Decret 1977, p. 65
- ^ Hassine Fantar 1993, p. 128
- ^ Slim & Fauqué 2001, p. 44
- ^ Lancel 1999, p. 245
- ^ Beschaouch 1993, p. 102
- ^ Numerous archaeological pieces from Carthage are found in major museums like the Louvre Museum, the British Museum, but also in smaller museums like the Archaeological Museum in Kraków.
- ^ Abdelmajid Ennabli (1998). "Le musée de Carthage : un lieu de mémoire" [The Carthage Museum: a place of memory] (PDF). Museum International (in French) (198): 23–32. Retrieved 26 March 2021.
- ^ Yacoub 1995, p. 360
- ^ Yacoub 1995, pp. 215–221
- ^ Nayla Ouertani, "La sculpture romaine" [Roman sculpture] (in French), Collectif 1995, p. 94
- ^ Picard 1951, p. 68
- ^ Hornby 1995, p. 50
- ^ "Pour sauver Carthage : allocution de M. René Maheu, Directeur général de l'UNESCO, Carthage, le 19 mai 1972" (PDF). unesdoc.unesco.org (in French). Retrieved 28 May 2020.
- ^ Collectif 1992, pp. 231–234
- ^ Abdelmajid Ennabli, "La campagne internationale de Carthage" [The Carthage international campaign] (in French), Collectif 1995, p. 102-117 .
- ^ Abdelmajid Ennabli, "La campagne internationale de Carthage" [The Carthage international campaign] (in French), Collectif 1995, p. 105 .
- ^ "Décret n°85-1246 du 7 octobre 1985, relatif au classement du site de Carthage" [Decree n°85-1246 of October 7, 1985, concerning the classification of the Carthage site] (PDF). Journal officiel de la République tunisienne (in French) (73): 1413–1414. October 18, 1985. ISSN 0330-7921..
- ^ Excerpt from the UNESCO report on the archaeological park project cited by Collectif 1992, p. 237 .
- ^ a b c Sophie Bessis (September 1999). "Défendre Carthage, encore et toujours" [Defending Carthage, again and always]. Le Courrier de l'Unesco (in French) (1206): 40–41. Retrieved 28 May 2020..
Bibliography
editGeneral bibliography and on Africa
edit- -Claude Baurain; Corinne Bonnet (1992). Les Phéniciens, marins des trois continents [The Phoenicians, sailors of the three continents] (in French). Paris: Armand Colin. ISBN 978-2-200-21223-0.
- Aïcha Ben Abed (1992). Le musée du Bardo: une visite guidée [The Bardo Museum: a guided tour] (in French). Tunis: Cérès. ISBN 978-9973-70083-4.
- Claude Briand-Ponsart; Christophe Hugoniot (2005). L'Afrique romaine: de l'Atlantique à la Tripolitaine, 146 av. J.-C. - 533 apr. J.-C [Roman Africa: from the Atlantic to Tripolitania, 146 BC - 533 AD] (in French). Paris: Armand Colin. ISBN 978-2-200-26008-8.
- Paul Corbier; Marc Griesheimer (2005). L'Afrique romaine: 146 av. J.-C. - 439 apr. J.-C [Roman Africa: 146 BC - 439 AD] (in French). Paris: Ellipses. ISBN 978-2-729-82441-9.
- Elisabeth Fontan; Hélène Le Meaux (2007). La Méditerranée des Phéniciens: de Tyr à Carthage [The Mediterranean of the Phoenicians: from Tyre to Carthage] (in French). Paris: Institut du monde arabe/Somogy. ISBN 978-2-757-20130-5.
- Michel Gras; Pierre Rouillard; Javier Teixidor (1994). L'univers phénicien [The Phoenician universe] (in French). Paris: Arthaud. ISBN 978-2-700-30732-0.
- Christophe Hugoniot (2000). Rome en Afrique: de la chute de Carthage aux débuts de la conquête arabe [Rome in Africa: from the fall of Carthage to the beginnings of the Arab conquest] (in French). Paris: Flammarion. ISBN 978-2-080-83003-6.
- Yann Le Bohec (2005). Histoire de l'Afrique romaine [History of Roman Africa] (in French). Paris: Picard. ISBN 978-2-708-40751-0.
- Edward Lipinski, ed. (1992). Dictionnaire de la civilisation phénicienne et punique [Dictionary of Phoenician and Punic civilization] (in French). Turnhout: Brepols. ISBN 978-2-503-50033-1.
- Hédi Slim; Nicolas Fauqué (2001). La Tunisie antique: de Hannibal à saint Augustin [Ancient Tunisia: from Hannibal to Saint Augustine] (in French). Paris: Mengès. ISBN 978-2-856-20421-4.
- Mohamed Yacoub (1993). Le musée du Bardo: départements antiques [The Bardo Museum: antique departments] (in French). Tunis: Agence nationale du patrimoine. ISBN 978-9-973-91712-6.
- Mohamed Yacoub (1995). Splendeurs des mosaïques de Tunisie [Splendors of the mosaics of Tunisia] (in French). Tunis: Agence nationale du patrimoine. ISBN 9973-917-23-5.
General works on Carthage or the archaeological site in general
edit- -Maria Giulia Amadasi Guzzo (2007). Carthage [Carthage] (in French). Paris: Presses universitaires de France. ISBN 978-2-13-053962-9.
- Azedine Beschaouch (1993). La légende de Carthage [The legend of Carthage]. Découvertes Gallimard (in French). Paris: Gallimard. ISBN 978-2-070-53212-4.
- Abdelmajid Ennabli (2020). Carthage. « Les travaux et les jours »: recherches et découvertes, 1831-2016 [Carthage. "The works and the days": research and discoveries, 1831-2016] (in French). Paris: CNRS Éditions. ISBN 978-2-271-13115-7.
- Abdelmajid Ennabli; Alain Rebourg (1993). Carthage: le site archéologique [Carthage: the archaeological site] (in French). Tunis: Cérès. ISBN 978-9-973-70083-4.
- Abdelmajid Ennabli; Georges Fradier; Jacques Pérez (1995). Carthage retrouvée [Carthage rediscovered] (in French). Paris: Herscher. ISBN 978-9-973-19055-0.
- Madeleine Hours-Miédan (1982). Carthage [Carthage]. Que sais-je ? (in French). Paris: Presses universitaires de France. ISBN 978-2-130-37489-3.
- Colette Picard (1951). Carthage [Carthage] (in French). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
- Collective (1995). Carthage, l'histoire, sa trace et son écho: les Musées de la ville de Paris, Musée du Petit Palais, 9 mars-2 juillet 1995 [Carthage, history, its trace and its echo: the Museums of the city of Paris, Petit Palais Museum, March 9 - July 2, 1995] (in French). Paris: Association française d'action artistique. ISBN 978-2-879-00196-8.
- Collective (1990). Carthage et son territoire dans l'Antiquité, IVe colloque international (tenu à Strasbourg du 5 au 9 avril 1988) [Carthage and its territory in Antiquity, 4th international colloquium (held in Strasbourg from April 5 to 9, 1988)] (in French). Paris: Comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques. ISBN 978-2-735-50201-1.
- Collective (October 2007). "La Méditerranée des Phéniciens" [The Mediterranean of the Phoenicians]. Connaissance des Arts (in French) (344). ISSN 0293-9274.
- Collective (1994). La Tunisie, carrefour du monde antique [Tunisia, crossroads of the ancient world]. Les dossiers d'archéologie (in French). Dijon: Faton. ISBN 978-2-87844-020-1.
- Collective (1992). Pour sauver Carthage: exploration et conservation de la cité punique, romaine et byzantine [To save Carthage: exploration and conservation of the Punic, Roman, and Byzantine city] (in French). Paris/Tunis: Unesco/Institut national d'archéologie et d'art. ISBN 978-9-232-02782-5.
- Collective (2012). Rapport de mission: site archéologique de Carthage (Tunisie), 24-28 janvier 2012 [Mission report: archaeological site of Carthage (Tunisia), January 24-28, 2012] (in French). Paris: Comité du patrimoine mondial.
Phoenician and Punic Carthage
edit- -Gilbert Charles-Picard; Colette Picard (1958). La vie quotidienne à Carthage au temps d'Hannibal [Daily life in Carthage at the time of Hannibal] (in French). Paris: Hachette.
- François Decret (1977). Carthage ou l'empire de la mer [Carthage or the empire of the sea]. Points-Histoire (in French). Paris: Éditions du Seuil. ISBN 978-2-020-04712-8.
- Hédi Dridi (2006). Carthage et le monde punique [Carthage and the Punic world] (in French). Paris: Les Belles Lettres. ISBN 978-2-251-41033-3.
- Hédi Dridi (2012). "Recherches sur la topographie religieuse de la Carthage punique" [Research on the religious topography of Punic Carthage]. Annuaire de l'École pratique des hautes études : Section des sciences historiques et philologiques (in French). 143 (143): 14–17. doi:10.4000/ashp.1256. ISSN 0292-0980. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
- M'hamed Hassine Fantar (1995). Carthage la cité punique [Carthage the Punic city] (in French). Tunis: Cérès. ISBN 978-2-271-05191-2.
- M'hamed Hassine Fantar (1993). Carthage: approche d'une civilisation [Carthage: approach to a civilization] (in French). Tunis: Alif. ISBN 978-2-271-05028-1.
- Serge Lancel (1999). Carthage [Carthage] (in French). Tunis: Cérès. ISBN 978-9-973-19420-6.
Roman and Byzantine Carthage
edit- -Fethi Bejaoui (1995). "La Carthage de saint Augustin" [The Carthage of Saint Augustine]. Connaissance des Arts (in French) (69 (special issue)). ISSN 0293-9274.
- Liliane Ennabli (1997). Carthage, une métropole chrétienne du IVe à la fin du VIIe [Carthage, a Christian metropolis from the 4th to the end of the 7th century] (in French). Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique. ISBN 978-2-271-05402-9.
- Pierre Gros (1992). "Colline de Byrsa : les vestiges romains" [Byrsa hill: the Roman remains]. Pour sauver Carthage : exploration et conservation de la cité punique, romaine et byzantine [To save Carthage: exploration and conservation of the Punic, Roman, and Byzantine city] (in French). Paris/Tunis: Unesco/Institut national d'archéologie et d'art. pp. 99–103. ISBN 978-9-232-02782-5.
- Pierre Gros (1990). "Le premier urbanisme de la Colonia Julia Carthago" [The first urbanism of the Colonia Julia Carthago]. L'Afrique dans l'Occident romain. Ier - IVe : actes du colloque de Rome (3-5 décembre 1987) [Africa in the Roman West. 1st - 4th centuries: proceedings of the Rome colloquium (December 3-5, 1987)] (in French). Rome: École française de Rome. pp. 547–573. ISBN 978-2-728-30183-6.
- Paulette Hornby (1995). "Auguste et la Nouvelle Rome" [Augustus and the New Rome]. Connaissance des Arts (in French) (69 (special issue)): 48–53. ISSN 0293-9274.
- Alexandre Lézine (1969). Les thermes d'Antonin à Carthage [The Baths of Antoninus in Carthage] (in French). Tunis: Société tunisienne de diffusion.